Symbolic Setting of ‘To the
Lighthouse’
Written from multiple perspectives
and shifting between times and characters with poetic grace, ‘To
The Lighthouse’ is not concerned with ordinary story
telling. Rather through integrate symbolic web it reads the mind and recounts
the passage of multiple experiences of different characters in the novel.
The sea with its waves is to be heard
throughout the novel. It symbolizes the eternal flux of time and life, in the
midst of which we all exist; it constantly changes its character. To Mrs.
Ramsay at one moment it sounds soothing and consoling like a cradlesong, at
others, “like a ghostly roll of drums remorselessly beating a warning of
death it brings terror. Sometimes its power “sweeping savagely in”,
seems to reduce the individual to nothingness, at others it sends up “a
fountain of bright water” – which seems to match the sudden springs of
vitality in the human spirit.
The lighthouse holds a whole cluster
of suggestions. It is a mystery, yet a concern for day-to-day living. It is at
once distant and close at the mercy of its destructive forces. The lighthouse
surrounded by sea always illumines and clarifies the human condition in some
way. Moreover, it is the quest for the values which lighthouse suggests. The
tower is frequently shadowed in mist, its beams are intermittent in the
darkness, the moments of assurance they bring the momentary, but upon these
assurances reality rests, by landing on the general doubts, something which
seems to triumph over the eternal cycle of change. To reach the lighthouse is
to establish a creative relationship.
Indeed, the lighthouse is the most important symbol and different critics have
explained it differently. For example, Russel declares that the lighthouse is
the feminine creative principle. Jon Bennett calls the alternate light and
shadows of the lighthouse the rhythm of joy and sorrow, understanding and
misunderstanding. The lighthouse as symbol has not one meaning, that it is a
vital synthesis of time and eternity: an objective correlative for Mrs.
Ramsay’s vision, after whose death it is her meaning.
The window is not a
transparent but a separating sheet of glass between reality and Mrs. Ramsay’s
mind. Mrs. Ramsay experiences such moments of revelation and integration at
watching the window. It is the very symbol of the imperfection of our knowledge
and riddle of human mind. It is debates about philosophy, particularly
theories about visual reality on the three main philosophers of British
empiricism, John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume. The basic argument of
empiricism is whether or not a person can be empirically certain that objects
have a distinct and continued existence apart from our perceptions of them.
The characters are carefully arranged
in the novel in their relation to each other, so that a definite symbolic
pattern emerges. Mrs. Ramsay pervades the whole book.
Mrs. Ramsay is the mother of the Ramsay family who dies
during the middle section of the novel. A beautiful, caring woman, she means
all things to all people, and each character of To the Lighthouse has
a different perception of her personality. Lily sees her as a mother, and
doesn’t think she has ever inspired romantic passion. William Bankes and
Charles Tansley adore her, and think she doesn’t realize how beautiful she is.
The children see her as the “Lighthouse”
of their lives—the stable, warm force that protects and guides them. She is
above all the creator of fertile human relationships symbolized by her love of
match making and her knitting; and of warm comfort symbolized by her green
shawl. Just as Mrs. Ramsay stands for creative vitality, so Mr. Ramsay stands
as the symbol of the sterile, destructive barriers to relationship. Just as
Mrs. Ramsay is described in images of fertility and the warmth and comfort of
love and harmony with others, Mr. Ramsay is evoked in images of sterility,
hardness and cruelty and of deliberate isolation.
Lily
Briscoe’s accomplishment of her painting is also symbolic to a great extent.
Lily sees that Mrs. Ramsay’s gift of harmonizing human relationship into
memorable moments is “almost like a work of art” and in the book art is
the ultimate symbol for the enduring ‘reality’. She neither in first nor
in second part of the work of fiction can be able to complete her picture. In
the whole period that contains more than a decade, she is perplexed about to
fill the gap of her picture, but at the lighthouse, she executes her
production. This symbolizes that an artist can be impeccable in his art when he
reaches and finds the final limitations of reality or truth.
The uses of symbols serve the purpose
of introspection, self-awareness, and openness to the unconscious in the
novel. To The Lighthouse is
a masterpiece of construction through symbolism.
‘To the Lighthouse’: Emblematic
of Social Change/A Feminist Novel
‘To the Lighthouse’ scrutinizes the role of women or more
specifically, the evolution of the modern woman. The two main female characters
in the novel, Mrs. Ramsay and Lily Briscoe, both represent different views on
life and follow different paths on their search for meaning. Lily Briscoe
transcends the traditional female gender roles embodied by Mrs. Ramsay; by
coming into her own as an independent and modern woman, she symbolises the
advent of modernism and rejection of traditional Victorian values.
The traditional female gender roles of passivity and submission
are first reinforced by Mrs. Ramsay's attitude and behaviour towards her
husband and the guests at her house. Mrs. Ramsay is not a helpless woman but
she is not independent in the way that Lily Briscoe is. While she is perfectly
capable of being the boss of trivial and "womanly" things such
as dinner, the higher level decisions are always made by her husband.
Virginia Woolf's To the Lighthouse illustrates a bridge between
the worlds of the Victorian mother and the modern, potentially independent
woman. The Victorian woman was to be absorbed, as Mrs. Ramsay is, by the task
of being mother and wife. Her reason for existing was to complete the man,
rather than to exist in her own right. Mrs. Ramsay certainly sees this role for
herself and is disturbed when she feels, momentarily, that she is better than
her husband because he needs her support to feel good about himself and the
life choices he has made. Yet the end of the Victorian era saw the rise of women's
rights and greater freedom for women to excel without men or children.
Adrienne Rich, in ‘Of Woman Born’, says that ‘To the
Lighthouse’ is about Virginia Woolf's need to understand her own mother and to
prove, through the character of Lily Briscoe, that a woman can be "independent
of men, as Mrs. Ramsay is not".
The trauma of this transition from Victorian to modern woman is
portended by Mrs. Ramsay herself, at the beginning of the story. In the first
chapter, as Mrs. Ramsay defends Charles Tansley against the criticisms of her
children, she muses on her desire to protect men and the "trustful,
childlike, reverential" attitude that her protection inspires in men.
"Woe betides the girl . . . who did not feel the worth of it, and all that
it implied, to the marrow of her bones!" she exclaims to herself,
thinking of the way men respect and admire her. But Woolf shows us that as Mrs.
Ramsay admonishes her children for ridiculing Charles Tansley, her daughters "could
sport with infidel ideas which they had brewed for themselves of a life
different from hers . . . not always taking care of some man or other."
The issue of the change from one concept of womanhood to another
is not as simple as the newer generation revolting against the older; at the
same time that Mrs. Ramsay's daughters hope to be different, they admire and
worship their mother for her beauty and power. Prue, the eldest daughter,
proudly watches Mrs. Ramsay as she descends the staircase and feels "what
an extraordinary stroke of fortune it was for her (Prue), to have her [Mrs.
Ramsay]." Although this is the closest we come to knowing the thoughts
and feelings of Prue, from others' perspectives, we gather that she follows in
her mother's footsteps and dies in childbirth. Does this signify the death of
the old vision of womanhood? Or does it have more to do with the particular
strength of Mrs. Ramsay? Perhaps it signifies the futility of the daughter
trying to imitate exactly the path of the mother.
Mrs. Ramsey is triumphant over Mr. Ramsey, by her awareness and
intuitive feeling of the more important things in life: the value of human
relationships. Though she is submissive, with no mention of extensive
educational background, she innately possesses the crucial social skills that
gain: the cohesion of the family as a whole; the respect and love of her
children, and the continued survival of her marriage.
“The relation of art and life in ‘To the Lighthouse’
In ‘To
The Lighthouse ‘, Mrs. Ramsay opens the novel and
Lily Briscoe closes it, as the stuff of life may be converted,
through a particular medium, to a work of art. So, if life and art are viewed
as polar opposites in the novel. Mrs. Ramsay and
Lily Briscoe may be regarded as their respective exponents. Norman
Friedman opines that ’To the Lighthouse’ centres on questions of order and
chaos, male and female, permanence and change, and intellect and intuition.
It cannot be
disputed that art can be nourished only in life. But whereas art needs life to
nourish it, life is often unaware of the power of art to give it permanence.
Although Lily is in love with Mrs. Ramsay and, with all her family, she cannot
take Lily’s painting seriously. Thus, too, Mrs. Ramsay’s quite literal
short-sightedness is played against Lily’s ‘vision’. To Lily
it seems ironic that Mrs. Ramsay presided with immutable calm over destinies
which she completely failed to understand; Mrs. Woolf wants to suggest that life
may be its own worst enemy, even as the artist may
rebel against art’s strict exigencies. Although it is only momentary,
Mrs. Ramsay ‘felt alone in the presence of her old antagonist, life’. And
Lily is ‘drawn out of gossip, out of living, out of community with
people into the presence of the formidable ancient enemy of her....this
form....roused one to perpetual combat.’
In Part I,
Mrs. Ramsay is so busy with her family and too numerous summer guests. With her
masterfulness, she manages superbly other people’s lives, from trivial to
important aspect. On the other hand, Lily can barely manage to manipulate her
paint brushes, and shrinks from anything strange on her canvas. Later on, she
realizes a fundamental difference between herself and Mrs. Ramsay. Mrs. Ramsay
might fall occasionally into meditation but she ‘disliked anything that
reminded her that she had been seen sitting thinking.’ But both in Lily the
painter and Mr. Carmichael, the poet, there was some notion about the
ineffectiveness of action, the supremacy of thought.
Mrs. Ramsay
is a very ardent match-maker and she also feels protective towards
the whole male sex. She is also eager to help the poor and the sick. And then
she is found striving earnestly for the unity and integrity of social scenes
such as her dinner party. Lily Briscoe also acknowledges Mrs. Ramsay’s
manipulation of life. But, ironically, Mrs. Ramsay is seen ‘making’
while Lily merely ‘tried’. But unfortunately Mrs. Ramsay’s efforts are
doomed from the start; life cannot stand still; time must pass. It is only in
another sphere can moments be given permanence. And the notable difference
between the two is that Mrs. Ramsay has the rare beauty of ordering a scene so
that it is, ‘like a work of art’, but it is Lily who creates a concrete
work of art.
From the very
beginning, in spite of all her doubts and diffidence, Lily is found of painting
with stubborn integrity to her vision. It is the resolution to move her tree to
the centre of the canvas that sustains her through the dinner party, protects
her against Charles Tansley’s pronouncement that women cannot paint
or write. Lily’s paint brush has become for her ‘the one dependable thing in
a world of strife, ruin, chaos’ and she seems more sure of her technique:
the lines are nervous, but her brush-strokes are decisive. It is she who
imagines the artistic creeds of Carmichael “how ‘you’ and ‘I’ and ‘she’
pass, and vanish; nothing stays all changes; but not words not paint”. Yet
even then, even to the final brush-stroke that brings the novel to a close, she
continues to be haunted by the problematical and shifting relationship of art
and life.
This relation
of art to life has been most beautifully treated in Part III of the novel. Lily
is on the island accompanied by the corresponding movement of those in the boat
getting closer to the Lighthouse and Lily, getting closer to the solution
of her aesthetic problem. And the determining factor of each is love (the art
of life), which might perhaps be defined as order. Lily finishes her painting
as she feels that sympathy for Mr. Ramsay which she had previously refused to
give. James and Cam give up their long standing antagonism towards
their father. Mr. Ramsay himself, at the same time, attains a resolution of his
own tensions and worries. Hence ‘the two actions, the arrival at the
lighthouse and the last stroke of the push are also united; both are acts of
completion and it is obvious that they are meant to happen together.’ Therefore,
reality always has a doubleness which can be understood only through a double
vision or synthesis.
‘Stream of Consciousness’ Technique in ‘To The Lighthouse
In ‘To The Lighthouse’
Virginia Wolf has not told a story in the sense of a series of events and has
concentrated on a small number of characters. Their nature and feelings are
represented to us largely through their interior monologue. In order to capture
the inner reality, the truth about life, she tried to represent the moving current
of life and the individual’s consciousness of the fleeting moments and
secondly, also to select from this current and organize it so that novel
may penetrate between the surface reality and may give to the readers a sense
of understanding and completeness. In other words, she has used ‘stream
of consciousness’ technique.
The
novel as a whole is reflective rather than spontaneous, and the obvious
selection by the author focuses our attention on the idea of the working of the
mind, which is more interesting than a more naturalistic limitation of its
confused process. First the reader is introduced to the characters and the
world they occupy. Since are put before us through the thoughts of on the
characters they come to us with associations of the characters’ personality and
so we begin to be involved in the tensions between; we being with the
opposition of Mr. and Mrs. Ramsay,
brought to us through the reactions of the sensitive child and with reference
to the lighthouse, then move to the antagonism around by Tansley, the
quarrelsomeness of the children the impassive Carmichael; and so the grow to
number and the texture of the books becomes complex as the novelist being to
weave them together.
Thus,
too, the pattern beings to establish itself; the pattern that is of
conversation and reaction, of the actual words in the first person and the
present tense, and the reflections of the characters in the third person and
the past tense. The opening conversation consists of only eight short remarks
of a normal, even trivial kind, but from the beginning we are made aware that
the surface of normal human relationships conceals a mass of tangled feelings
and associations and that these feelings can be strong and passionate, though
they are concealed. This violence of feelings is seen first in the child,
James, and seems natural to the exaggeration of childhood, we are thus prepared
in an acceptable way for the emotions of the adult characters, tempered by age
and experience, but made more complex too.
It
is by means of this combination of the conversation that is actually happening
and the connected thoughts that may range over any event, that a time – scheme
is also established in a sense of the present movement seen in relationship to
the past which is continually woven in with the present in the minds of most
people.
The
third person narration is very common a device in novel.
Virginia Woolf is however, very careful to make her direction of speech for the
interior monologues of her characters which makes it easy for her to work into
these mental soliloquies a number of statements and ideas which are outside the
range of knowledge of the characters she is dealing with. When, for
example, at the beginning, she describes the feelings of James about his
father, she moves from the child’s thinking to what Mr. Ramsay habitually did
and said, through impersonal sentences. The statements in the middle
here clearly develop from what James is thinking, but we seem to move away from
the child himself into a general comment, which in turn, merges into the
description of Mr. Ramsay’s attitude towards life. Yet we hardly notice this
shift because of the uniformity of style; the two currents of thought seem to
flow together. Just as this third-person narration makes it possible for Virginia Woolf to
move smoothly from one character to another so in the novel as a whole it is a
unifying principle.
Mrs.
Woolf has cleverly avoided the drawbacks of the stream of consciousness novel
as she has given from and coherence to her material. She is not haphazard and incoherent
like the other stream of consciousness novelist.
To The Lighthouse is a Study of Human Relationships
The
main subject of the novel may justly be called a study of the ways and
means by which satisfactory human relationship might be established with the
people around them. Human beings seemed to Mrs. Woolf isolated and a
cluster of individuals having unsatisfactory communication that too was sometimes
mistaken.
Since
in a human society words are the main sources of establishing an agreeable
relationship but words are very often inadequate for the purpose. Sometimes
words cannot express the full complexity of a character’s thoughts
and feelings. Moreover, what words express is only a fraction of what
a character thinks and feels. Therefore, a speaker is misconstrued instead. To Carmichael, Lily tries to describe
Mrs. Ramsay but her words are unable to transport her feelings. “Words fluttered sideways and struck the object inches to
low. Then one gave it up; For how could one express in words these
emotions of the body?”
Quite
often it seems that silence is more expressive and eloquent than words. Lily
realizes it fully and feels full communication with Carmichael without uttering
words. While sitting on the lawn in perfect silence they seem to
understand each other perfectly well without exchanging even a single word.
Finally, Lily realises: ‘They had not needed to speak. They had been
thinking the same thing and he had answered her without, her asking him
anything’.
It
can be observed that things of very little importance can be greatly helpful in
establishing congenial human relationships. As we find Mr. Ramsay coming to
Lily to seeking sympathy but Lily finds it hard to utter a single word.
Suddenly, she praises his boots. And this brings great relief to Mr. Ramsay and
he feels satisfied. Apparently Lily’s remarks may seem silly but it helped to
establish perfect sympathy and Lily ‘felt her eyes swell and tingle with
tears’.
Congenial and satisfactory human relationships are
essential for happiness in life. It cannot be achieved through logic,
reason and intellect, but through emotions. Emotional understanding and a pure
considerate attitude are needed for pleasant relationships among family
members. Mr. Ramsay becomes a ‘sarcastic
brute’ in the eyes of his children owing to his cold intellectual approach
whereas Mrs. Ramsay with her loving soul and sympathetic understanding wins the
heart of the children and is tremendously loved and admired by her children.
Mr. and Mrs. Ramsay signify intellect and compassion respectively.
In
‘To the Lighthouse’ it is conspicuous that Mrs. Ramsay plays a very significant
to establish communication between people. She sincerely attempts to get
Paul and Minta as well as Lily and Mr. Bankes married. At the dinner party, seeing the unease of her
guests, she makes efforts to get people talking in order to get them closer. In
the novel we observe the feelings and reactions of the characters towards each
other being in the state of isolation. No one is free from his private worries
and is living in his own isolated shell. For instance, Tansley is sensitive,
feeling socially inferior, unattractive and poor. So he tries to assert himself
rudely. He repels and displeases almost all except Mr. Ramsay. Since Mrs.
Ramsay is pictured as the rare person who can make others show their best side,
and she draws from him simple and selfless behaviour and feeling, which
are just as much part of her personality as rudeness, in the tender moments of
their walk together.
At
the dinner party Tansely desperately tries to assert himself but ends up
without making any impression on the conversation. To Lily he is already
repulsive and she pretentiously asks him to accompany her to the lighthouse
which flares up Tansely. Mrs. Ramsay implores Lily’s help in making the party
comfortable so Lily in almost in the same words, but with a change of feeling
asks Tansely to take her to the lighthouse, now his egoism is satisfied and he
is able to shine, for he is intelligent and well-informed. Affable relationship between Tansley and the
others at the table is established and the party thus becomes a success.
There
is a note of pretence and falsehood even in the husband-wife relationship
between Mr. and Mrs. Ramsay. Mrs. Ramsay is compelled to praise Mr. Ramsay to
his face just to boost up his confidence. He constantly needs ‘intellectual
sympathy’ and reassurance. His fear of failure and resentment prevents his
judgment. There is some sort of reserve between them, in her moods of sadness,
he is unable to communicate with her. But his dependence on her and her respect
and reverence for him balance these areas of difference.
we
find them pools apart when their disagreement about going to the Lighthouse
brings out their difference in their attitudes to life. Mr. Ramsay is upset, is
rather infuriated. “The extraordinary
irrationality of her remark, the folly of women’s minds enraged him…..and now
she flew in the face of facts, made her children hope what was utterly out of
the question, in effect, told lies.” He thinks that children must learn to
face facts and know life is hard. Mrs. Ramsay, who believes in protecting
children from losing the innocence of childhood, finds her husband’s attitude
quite repugnant. “To pursue truth with such astonishing lack of
consideration for other people’s feelings, to rend the thin veils of
civilization so wantonly, so brutally, was to her so horrible an outrage of
human decency’. But very soon after
this incident they begin to come together again. It starts with Mrs. Ramsay’s
apology. “And as she looked at him she began to smile, for though she has
not said a word, he knew, of course that she loved him”.
It
may be rightly assert that ‘To The Lighthouse’ is a close study of
the ways and means by which satisfactory and congenial human relationships might
be established.
Character
Portrayal of Mrs. Ramsay in ‘To the Lighthouse’
Mrs.
Ramsay, one of the finest creations of Virginia Woolf, is without the least
shade of doubt the central figure around which action and movement
in ‘To The Lighthouse’ is built. She is definitely radiating
through the entire novel and impregnating all the other characters. From the
very beginning of the novel, structurally or psychologically, she is the
cohesive force and the source of unity.
Mrs.
Ramsay’s great role as a unifying and cohesive force is superbly revealed to us
at the dinner party. She performs creditably her duty of connecting the
different individuals. And for this she has also to engage herself with some of
them. Lily and Charles Tansley are at opposite poles. Mrs. Ramsay asks
Lily to be considerate to Tansley, thus Tansley is brought out of his isolation
and he feels at ease. Likewse, with the little acts of cooperation she pacifies
Mr. Ramsay and draws both Mr. Carmichael and old Mr. Bankes are also brought
out of their respective shells. Therefore, it is clearly revealed ‘the whole
effort of the merging and flowing and creating rested on her’.
Mr.
Ramsay is completely dependent on Mrs. Ramsay. He leans upon her for sympathy
and encouragement and repeatedly comes to her to be reassured. She always
encourages him and revives his self-confidence which he so badly needs. Mrs.
Ramsay was, no doubt, advanced in age and the mother of the eight children,
still she possessed great physical charm and attractiveness. Her personal
appeal unmistakably lies in her physical charm. Mrs Woolf tells us how her
husband feels about her: “Indeed, she had the whole of the other sex under
her protection.”
Beauty
without grace and dignity cannot have so much influence on others. She has
abundant feminine graces. She is polite and cultured in her manners and
kind and considerate in her temperament. She is absolutely free from all
egotism and is never in a mood to assert herself. Hence her graceful manners
and kind disposition combined with her extraordinary physical charm cast a
healthy spell on all who came in contact with her.
Mrs.
Ramsay often feels the need ‘to be silent, to be alone.’ In a mood of
detachment, she muses upon the alternating flashes of light. This musing gives
her a sense of victory over live. This is a one aspect of her vision. The
second is evoked as her mood soon changes into one of grim recognition of the
inevitable facts of ‘suffering, death, the poor’. She gradually descends
from her state of triumphant freedom to the fret.
Mrs.
Ramsay may also be taken as a symbol of the female principle in life. She is
essentialy feminine and the novelist emphasized her famine weaknesses. As she
has a habit of exaggerating which irks her husband and she muddle-headed and
cannot remember the facts, or distinguish between them. Some critics hold the view that Mrs. Ramsay
has been treated as a symbol and has not been individualized by the novelist.
In spite of this indefiniteness and symbolic traits Mrs. Ramsay is quite an
individualized figure and is undoubtedly one of the
great immortals of English literature.
The
most outstanding trait of Mrs. Ramsay’s character is her compassion for the
poor and the unfortunate, Her heart overflows with the milk of human sympathy
and kindness. She knits stockings for the sick son of the Lighthouse-keeper.
She feels for them all as they are to live a dull and unhappy life in a lonely
island. She goes to the town to help the poor and the needy. She extends extra
care to Tansely for the same reason.
Then
we find her having great affection and sympathetic consideration for
the children. She is a kind mother who can tactfully soothe and comfort her
children. She knows the truth, yet not to dishearten her seven-year-old son she
deviates from truth. But Mr. Ramsay shatters the hope of a young soul
by bluntly telling him that they won’t be able to go to the Lighthouse the next
day due to inclement weather. And this difference of attitude reveals the sharp
contrast between the husband and the wife. Above all, in spite of great
difference in temperament and in their attitude Mrs. Ramsay is a constant
source of inspiration to Mr. Ramsay. She knows that he is absolutely dependent
on her for sympathy and understanding.
Mrs.
Ramsay’s mania for matchmaking reveals is yet another significant aspect of
establishing peace and harmony among people. She sincerely attempts to get Paul
and Minta as well as Lily and Mr. Bankes married. It is a matter of pride for her for bringing them
together. Of course she cannot be blamed if their marriage is a failure.
Mrs. Ramsay dominates the novel not only during her life
time but even after her death with no less importance. The imposing physical
presence of Mrs. Ramsay pervades the whole book. Her influence on other
important characters—specially on Lily Briscoe —is really very great. It is
only to fulfil one of Mrs. Ramsay’s cherished wishes that Mr. Ramsay undertakes
the journey to the Lighthouse. Mrs. Ramsay is constantly presented through Lily
Briscoe’s consciousness, and her full significance as a uniting force is
clearly revealed. And it is the vision
of this departed soul that inspires Lily Briscoe to take up her brush again to
complete her great picture. James Hafley is quite correct when he remarks that
Mrs. Ramsay dead is more powerful than Mr. Ramsay living. According to James
Hafley, Mrs. Ramsay rises from death and lives again and becomes an immortal.
Mrs.
Ramsay might have some little flaws in her character such as her susceptibility
to flattery. It might be that she wanted to be praised or appreciated while
helping others or doing some good deed. But with her extreme civility and
goodness, with her irresistible charms and dominating personality hers is a
unique character from the pen of a great artist.
Great job
ReplyDeleteUseful.... thank you for sharing.
ReplyDeleteSuperb!
ReplyDeleteI've found another related article brief and awesome.
Visit
https://www.msmsol.com/2020/12/symbolism-in-to-lighthouse-by-virginia.html
nice and very informative post
ReplyDelete